Who said the following? Biden, Trump, Obama or Putin?
“Society is wondering whether [the] monopolism [of multinational tech companies] meets public interests. Where is the border between successful global business, in-demand services and big data consolidation, and the attempts to manage society at one’s own discretion and in a tough manner, replace legal democratic institutions and essentially usurp or restrict the natural right of people to decide for themselves how to live, what to choose and what position to express freely?”
This is a quote from a fascinating speech by Vladimir Putin to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2021 (link to transcript below). The WEF was founded by Swiss academic Klaus Schwab in the ‘70s and since then has expanded to an annual event in Davos, Switzerland attended by 2- to 3000 invited “elites,” including business leaders (Bill Gates and tech giants), world leaders (Trump spoke to them, too. Link below) economists, and celebrities. Their purpose is “tackling the world’s greatest challenges,” of which Climate Change is undoubtedly their favorite, but which includes everything from quantum computing to promoting LGBTQ rights. (For a partial list, see the Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution—link below.) According to the WEF website, the WEF is in the “next phase of its journey as the global platform for public-private cooperation” (that is, big government in cahoots with big corporations.)
Putin spoke at Davos immediately after he and Biden signed “The New START” which limits the size of the two countries’ strategic nuclear arsenals. Similar to other world leaders’ speeches, the subtext is what Putin wants or needs to stay in power. And he is fairly direct. Beginning with comparing the economic advancement of developing nations to developed western nations, he showed that while hundreds of millions of individuals in developing nations (Russia and China) saw their purchasing power increase, individuals in developed nations (the US, the EU) actually saw decreases. Between 2000 and 2016, more than two million Americans sank into poverty while the cost of education and health skyrocketed. He cited figures of uneducated and unemployed young adults worldwide. He implies the fault lies with multi-national tech companies for fomenting unrest and controlling their “audience” with propaganda.
He fears: “Unresolved and mounting internal socioeconomic problems may push people to look for someone to blame for all their troubles and to redirect their irritation and discontent. We can already see this. We feel that the degree of foreign policy propaganda rhetoric is growing.”
Was he referring to the 2016 election and the extent to which he was blamed, and the Russia hoax which crippled Trump’s ability to interact with him? And is he also speaking of the tech promoted propaganda surrounding Wokism?
He goes on: “We can expect the nature of practical actions to also become more aggressive, including pressure on the countries that do not agree with a role of obedient controlled satellites, use of trade barriers, illegitimate sanctions and restrictions in the financial, technological and cyber spheres.” Here, he’s not referring to countries exerting these pressures, but the multi-national corporations . . . that is, the members of Davos.
Then comes the threat: “Such a game with no rules critically increases the risk of unilateral use of military force. The use of force under a far-fetched pretext is what this danger is all about. This multiplies the likelihood of new hot spots flaring up on our planet. This concerns us.” By “game with no rules,” he means multi-national tech companies, which, unlike nations, don’t abide by treaties. He says they “are not just some economic giants. In some areas, they are de facto competing with states. Their audiences consist of billions of users that pass a considerable part of their lives in these ecosystems.” These corporations issue demands—policies over Climate Change or LGBTQ rights, for example—and expect nations to comply.
So Putin is saying that Davos folk are making it hard to run his country, and that he will retaliate if he’s pushed too far. Putin is ruthless, and he’s also a realist. If all of the above threatens his power—and if NATO encroaches on his territory, he promised to come out swinging. Are we surprised he did?
On the WEF website, “Davos stands with Ukraine.” But how are the “elites” supporting the defense of Ukrainians? Or, are they set to build wealth from instability and collapse? It seems the Ukrainian people are pawns in a “game with no rules.” In fact, it feels like the entire world is victim to the “Davos Agenda”—with its attempt to control its billions through Covid-19 and Climate Change policies, and now rampant inflation and the threat of global conflict.
Incidentally, at Trump’s Davos speech, Trump indirectly addressed the same points Putin did—by boasting he was turning those threats around, that he had created jobs, and returned pride and purpose to the American people. No wonder he had to be stopped.
◆ https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/26/full-texttrump-davos-speech-transcript-370861
◆ https://www.weforum.org/centre-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/innovators
Many gun control bills are moving through the legislature. Read about them here. For updates, https://www.nraila.org.
Newsom’s vaccine mandate gets worse. As vaccine failure in children becomes glaringly evident, what’s the governor to do now?
Infanticide or ‘Pregnancy Loss?’ Abortion bill passes Assembly Judiciary Committee.
Judge strikes down corporate board diversity law in California.
Freedom, Truckers, Ukraine and Sean Penn
February 24 was my son’s birthday, the day of the Ukraine invasion. Talking to my husband and me from his apartment in Germany, Trevor expressed sadness. Ukraine was a favorite destination. He told us of a country, full of exciting freedom-loving young people, who are ambitious to bring democracy to their land. And then something clicked…follow my reasoning.
The Canadian Freedom Convoy were also freedom loving people—who, thanks to the internet and their phones, could create a fairly sophisticated protest, complete with lawyers and a Go Fund Me campaign. Trudeau sent the military to disband them; but, after allegedly getting calls from the World Economic Forum (WEF), he drops the restrictions and unfreezes protestor bank accounts. Why?
As the Ukraine invasion began, when one would think President Volodymyr Zelensky would have more urgent things to do, he did an interview with Sean Penn for a documentary Penn is producing. According to Variety, Penn began preparing for this documentary since November when Putin’s troops first appeared on the border. If Sean Penn knew a war was going to break out, then the EU did and so did Biden’s administration. Why did they wait to sanction Russia? Why didn’t Ukraine join the EU back then?
One of Biden’s first moves as president was to shut down the Keystone XL pipeline and buy oil from Russia, instantly driving up gas prices and triggering inflation. That also gave Russia needed cash and an incentive to invade oil rich Ukraine. On the day of the invasion, gas prices jumped again…and Biden, claiming to be tough on Russia while protecting Americans from further inflation, announced sanctions on Russia that don’t include oil: “Sanctions will ‘allow energy payments to continue.’” So, we’ll just keep buying oil from Russia while Keystone remains shut and prices skyrocket. Why? Weren’t we energy independent just a little more than a year ago?
What do these events have in common? The suppression of freedom loving people, who can achieve great things without government help. As the world recovers from Covid-19, the restrictions that allowed world leaders to taste the thrill of authoritarianism now seem ridiculous, and freedom loving people have begun appreciating freedom again.
In Canada, when cameras showed Justin Trudeau speaking to Parliament, behind him were empty seats. About four were occupied by helpers – nicely masked women and people of color, who clapped politely after he spoke. The image told a story of a man isolated from his citizenry—an image that encourages outsiders to see him as a dictator.
But perhaps, Trudeau doesn't need support because he’s supported by the Canadian Swamp (Call it the Tundra?). And like our Swamp, they’ve been infiltrated by the WEF and China, a player in the WEF since 2017.
What is the WEF? It’s a five day, annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland that brings together 3,000 paying members and selected participants—investors, business leaders, political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists. In short, among those hanging out to discuss global issues are Bill Gates, Xi Jinping, and yes, Sean Penn, who has been allied with Davos since at least 2009. WEF members are set on one world order. Quoting from their website: “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.” The next paragraph says Covid-19 provides a great opportunity to achieve this. Interestingly, in the past year, Zelensky has aligned with China and has spent time in Silicon Valley meeting the big players, so he’s become a WEF darling.
Because “oil and gas…must be transformed,” the US needs to buy oil from Russia even when they’re at war with an ally.
And Canada must stop bullying Truckers because Trudeau’s actions reveal too much about the real motives behind Covid restrictions.
Think about it. Trudeau came into power in 2015. Trump was elected in 2016, when he quickly, effectively began draining the Swamp. Then suddenly, Canada became a testing ground for Great Reset policies. In 2017, the same year Xi joined WEF, they passed the Gender Rights Identity Bill. They’ve pushed BIPOC and CRT and passed major gun restrictions. Most importantly, they’re about to implement a social credit system similar to China’s.
Canadians as a group are pleasant, reserved people who get along with each other because it’s unwise to judge the person digging your car out of a snow drift on a dark winter night. So, like Swedes, they do well with socialist policies, like National Health, and don’t question the government too much when Progressive forms of progress spring from Ottawa.
Until now. They love their freedom as much as we do, as much as Ukrainians do. So I wonder…is there any connection between appearing to give the Truckers their way, the launching of a Canadian social credit system, and a war that’s going to raise the price of oil world wide and further suppress the middle class? A war that could also be a great excuse for a Great Reset in the form of a social credit system in Europe. Or even here?
Perhaps Sean Penn knows the answer.
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/02/24/conservative-writer-lays-bare-myth-of-benevolentauthoritarianism-and-the-great-reset-in-brilliant-thread-1205089/ https://www.eenews.net/articles/biden-sanctions-will-allow-energy-payments-to-continue/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2022/02/21/russia-is-a-major-supplier-of-oil-to-the-us/? sh=3a3178f218c3 https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0608 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62913 https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/chinas-social-credit-program-creeps-canada https://variety.com/2022/film/news/sean-penn-ukraine-documentary-russia-invasion1235189570/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/
What is the truth about where we stand with electric vehicles? A detailed explanation follows.
California Tyrants Self-Identify: Only the Vaxxed Can Work. Kill Assembly Bill 1993 now.
CA lawmakers fast-track child health bills that will further erode parental rights and infringe on parents’ ability to maintain medical freedom.
More...
A San Francisco man says “it’s pretty f*cking easy” to be homeless there because the city is funding it.
California has an unaccountable bureaucracy controlling unaccountable political appointees, who then enact a map that cannot be challenged by the voters.
The governor’s budget is a tale of the good, the bad and the ugly.